moatproof
For boards / owners

The question is on your agenda.
Put the answer on file.

"What does AI do to us?" deserves better than a management narrative. An assessment answers it the way boards prefer: dated, scored, comparable, and filed.

The exposure statement

Scored like your other diligence products.

The company is decomposed into positions — the activities its earnings actually stand on — and each is scored M1–M5. The aggregate lands on the cover. Upside is priced as options, not narrated as ambition.

With the AI Act in force, "we have assessed AI risk" is becoming a governance expectation. A minuted, independent assessment is fiduciary cover; a slide from management is not. Why now →

Board · sample
Exposure statement
Exposure
M3.4
Positions
27
Priced options
4
PositionScore
Document reviewM4
Pricing deskM3
Client onboardingM2
Assessed 2026-07-17 · Nordkap Industri A/S
Beyond the boardroom

One ledger, three statements.

The same assessment renders for your other readers: a role statement that tells employees what actually changes, and a position statement your customers and suppliers can rely on. The board files the exposure; the organisation gets the honest version; the market gets the trust artifact. The three statements →

Exposure statement
For the board: scored positions, aggregate exposure, priced options. Filed and minuted.
Role statement
For employees: what changes, what doesn't, which skills matter next.
Position statement
For customers and suppliers: how you use AI, published and dated.
Reassessment
On a fixed cycle. Scores move when the evidence moves; cover that isn't current isn't cover.
No positions on file. An assessment produces your first statement.